Mechanical DesignRoboticsProduct Design

Groove-Based 3D Printed Prosthetic Hand

Master's Thesis · Penn State Mechanical Engineering · 2025

Prosthetic hand — front view
2.1×
Stress reduction vs. non-grooved
250,000
Fatigue cycles completed
6
Independent motors
~$125
Estimated build cost

Overview

This project designed and fabricated a fully functional prosthetic hand using TPU-based 3D printing and soft robotic principles. The core contribution is a novel groove pattern along each phalange that reduces stress concentration, improves joint flexibility, and extends fatigue life — all without compromising grip strength. The design was validated through finite element analysis, physical fatigue testing, fingertip force benchmarking, and real-world grasping trials.

  • Designed a novel groove-based TPU finger to reduce stress concentration and improve bending durability vs. conventional tendon-driven designs.
  • Ran ANSYS parameter sensitivity studies (FEA) across groove height, thickness, and spacing — validated with response surface method statistical analysis.
  • Built a custom cyclic test bench with servo motor, tendon routing system, and load cell to run 250,000-cycle fatigue and force output experiments.
  • Integrated six DC motors, a servo-driven thumb, and Arduino-based control into a compact palm housing designed from 3D hand scans.
  • Demonstrated power and precision grasps across rigid, soft, and irregular objects using the fully assembled hand.

Design process

3D hand scan used as anatomical reference

Artec Space Spider 3D scan — used as anatomical reference for finger and palm geometry

SolidWorks exploded assembly view

SolidWorks exploded assembly — finger, palm, and motor housing components


Research data

ANSYS finite element analysis comparing Von Mises stress between the grooved and non-grooved finger designs under identical 20 mm tendon displacement loading. The groove pattern reduces peak stress by more than 50%, directly extending fatigue life.

FEA Von Mises stress — grooved finger

Grooved finger — max stress 1.656 Pa

FEA Von Mises stress — non-grooved finger

Non-grooved finger — max stress 3.578 Pa

Response surface method — Von Mises stress FEA optimization

Von Mises stress — groove geometry FEA optimization (RSM)

Force transmission: groove vs non-groove at 90° and 135°

Force transmission — groove vs. non-groove at 90° and 135°


Design & build

Prosthetic hand front view

Front view — groove-based TPU fingers

Prosthetic hand back view

Back view — palm and wrist assembly

Palm internals showing motor layout comparison

Palm internals — final motor layout (DC motors + servo thumb)


Grasping tests

Prosthetic hand grasping a cylindrical object

Power grasp — deodorant

Live actuation demo


Electronics & control

Arduino-based motor control board

Arduino Uno, L298N motor drivers, DC-DC buck converter, and manual potentiometer control — all mounted on a custom 3D-printed panel

Tools & methods

SolidWorks · ANSYS Mechanical · Prusa XL 5T · Arduino · TPU & PLA · FEA · Response Surface Method · Mooney-Rivlin Hyperelastic Modeling


← All Projects